The Aesthetic Origin of “Intuition” and “Immediate Experience” according to Croce and Dewey

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student of Philosophy, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Art Research Department, Faculty of Art, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This article endeavors to elucidate the key concepts and views of Croce and Dewey within the framework of a comparative study of their philosophical systems, focusing specifically on aesthetics. The central hypothesis of this research is that the core idea of Dewey's philosophy, termed “immediate experience,” is a pragmatist interpretation of the closely related concept of “intuition” in Croce's aesthetics. Thus, both philosophers emphasize the role of aesthetics as a kind of a priori quality that ensures the unity and coherence of experience and knowledge. The defining difference lies in the fact that Croce, through the idea of “intuition-expression,” emphasizes the epistemological aspect of aesthetics, while Dewey conveys this same a priori quality in an ontological context (the process of the formation of experience). In other words, aesthetics, as an a priori quality, oversees the condition of unity and wholeness in the process of the formation of perception and guarantees the attainment of intuitive experience. In simpler terms, it is only by assuming a kind of aesthetic end (purposiveness without purpose) that the multifaceted and dynamic nature of perception is unified in an immediate and intuitive experience, and the possibility of “living” becomes feasible. A comparison of the views of Dewey and Croce, who belong to two contrasting intellectual traditions, reveals that the aforementioned hypothesis (i.e., the hypothesis that emphasizes the role of aesthetics as an a priori quality in the process of intuition and the formation of experience), regardless of whether its starting point is the realm of the objective (experience) or the realm of the subjective (intuition), leads to a unified conclusion, and its validity can be confidently asserted.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Banvari Nejad, Mojtaba (2017). “Edgham-e Tarikhgarayi-e Hegeli ba Tabiatgarayi-e Darvini Dar Bardasht-e John Dewey az Tajrobeh” [Integrating Hegelian Historicism with Darwinian Naturalism in John Dewey's Conception of Experience]. Do Faslname-ye Falsafi-ye Shenakht, Pazhuheshname-ye Olum-e Ensani, no. 1/76,  pp. 23-37 [in Persian].
Bergel, Lienhard (1957). Benedetto Croce (1866-1952), Books Abroad, Vol. 31, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 349-352 
Carus, Paul (1916). “Croce’s Use of the eord ‘Intuition’”, The Monist, Vol. 26, No. 2 (April), pp. 312-315.
Croce, Benedetto (1992). Aesthetic as Science of Expression and General Linguistic, trans. by Colin Lyas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croce, Benedetto (2007). Breviary of aesthetics: four lectures, trans. by Hiroko Fudemoto, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
de Gennaro, Angelo A. (1956). “The Drama of the Aesthetics of Benedetto Croce”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 15, No. 1 (September), pp. 117-121. 
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co., Publishers.
Dewey, J. (2012). Honar be Masabe-ye Tajrobeh [Art as Experience], trans. by Masoud Olya, Tehran: Qoqnus [in Persian].
Douglas, George H. (1970). “A Reconsideration of the Dewey-Croce Exchange”, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Summer), pp. 497-504.
Mack Smith, Denis (1973). “Benedetto Croce: History and Politics”, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Janury), pp. 41-61.
Musial, T. J. (1967). “Aesthetics and Pragmatism: John Dewey’s ‘Art as Experience’”, Notre Dame English Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 7–13. www.jstor.org/stable/40066419
Peirce, C. S. (1905). “Issues of Pragmaticism”, The Monist, Vol. XV, NO. 4, pp. 481–499.
Piccoli, Raffaello (1921). Benedetto Croce: An Introduction to his Philosophy, London: Jonathan Cape.
Tolstoy, Leo (1994). Honar Chist? [What is Art?], trans. by Kaveh Dehgan, Tehran: Amir Kabir [in Persian].
Townsend, Dabney (2014). Farhangname-ye Tarikhi-ye Zibayishenasi [Historical Dictionary of Aesthetics], trans. by Fariborz Majidi, Tehran: Farhangestan-e Honar [in Persian].
Warbeke, John M. (1926). “Benedetto Croce, Philosopher of Art”, The American Magazine of Art, Vol. 17, No. 12 (December), pp. 638-641.
Wedel, Theodore O. (1924). “Benedetto Croce's Theory of Aesthetic Criticism”, Studies in Philology, Vol. 21, No. 3 (July), pp. 480-491.