Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Visiting professor at Mazandaran University; PhD Student of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Professor of Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

The present analyzes Kant's subjectivist understanding of the concept of the event in the way aesthetic judgments are issued under the aesthetic experience. Heidegger returns to the original position of Ereignis or event in the way of finding the question about understanding the inner foundations of language. An event is a situation in which language reveals itself through speech and speaks about itself, and in this way, other beings also enter the field of presence. But in Kant, the subjectivist view of the event is revealed in the free play between imagination and understanding. Kant does not directly use the concept of event in explaining the beautiful thing. However, the examination of his view on the validity of aesthetic judgments indicates the cognitive interaction between understanding and imagination, which beyond epistemological rules and foundations is revealed in a general, necessary, and universal way in the situation of the event. From Kant's point of view, because the understanding is faced with difficulties in how to issue reflective judgments, and the understanding lacks prior categories that can formulate the sensory impressions contained in the imagination, therefore, the issuing of judgments outside of the cognitive rules is manifested in an event-like way. The subject goes beyond their subjectivity in relation to the object to beyond the object at the moment of encounter, they interact through the event of the game. It is the first interaction of the subject with the world and then the free play between imagination and understanding.

Keywords

Main Subjects

اشمیت، لارنس کی (1395) درآمدی بر فهم هرمنوتیک، ترجمۀ بهنام خداپناه، تهران: ققنوس.##
جوانلی، الکساندر (1398) متفکران بزرگ زیبایی‌شناسی، ترجمۀ امیر مازیار و همکاران. تهران: لگا. ##
سالاری، هادی؛ سلمانی، علی (1403) «نسبت خیال و والا در زیباشناسی کانت». پژوهش‌های فلسفی، شمارۀ 46، ص209ـ190؛  http//doi.org/10.22034/JPIUT.2024.58669.3607##
کانت، امانوئل (1377) نقد قوه حکم، ترجمۀ عبدالکریم رشیدیان، تهران: نشر نی. ##
کمالی، سیدمجید (1395) لوگوس و حقیقت زبان نزد هایدگر، اصفهان: نشر پرسش.##
Gadamer, Hans Georg (2006) Truth and Method, trans. by Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall, London: Continuum.##
Gardner, Sebastian (1999) Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, London: Routledge.##
Heidegger, Martin (1971) On the Way to Language, trans. By John Stambaugh, New York: Harper and Row.##
Heidegger, Martin (1993) Letter on Humanism, in Basic Writings, 2nd rev. & expanded ed., ed. by David F. Krell, New York: Harper Collins, pp. 213-266.##
Janaway, Christopher (1997) “Kant’s Aesthetics and The Empty Cognitive Stock”, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 189.##
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Critique of Pure Reason, ed. by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood, trans. by Paul Guyer & Eric Matthews, Cambridge University Press. ##
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. by Paul Guyer & Allen. W. Wood, trans. by Paul Guyer & Eric Matthews, Cambridge University Press. ##
Makkreel, Rudolf A. (1990) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant; the Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment, University of Chicago Press. ##