Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Stuent, Philosophy of Art, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Art Studies, Academy of Art, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The concept of "type/token" and the understanding of an artwork based on such an ontological framework in analytical aesthetics arises from the distinction between types of artworks and their media. Richard Wollheim, by rejecting the hypothesis of the artwork as a physical object and proposing the idea of type/token, examines the mode of being of the artwork in such a way as to include arts such as music or literature, which lack a material object, within his purview. In this context, two distinct ontological strategies are presented: on the one hand, artworks are defined as having an abstract and general existence of the type category; on the other hand, artworks are interpreted as concrete cultural manifestations of the token category. Wollheim argues that the nature of artworks can be interpreted based on the degree of sharing and transmission of features between general entities (types) and their elements (tokens). This research employs a descriptive-analytical method, and data collection has been conducted through a library-based approach.

Keywords

Main Subjects

ابوالقاسمی، محمدرضا (1395) «هستی‌شناسی موسیقی و اثر ادبی از دیدگاه رومن اینگاردن»، حکمت و فلسفه، سال 12، شمارة 4، ص22ـ7.##
احمدی افرمجانی، علی‌اکبر؛ رحمانیان، احمد (1395) «نلسون گودمن؛ مسئله وجودشناسانة ارزش هنر»، حکمت و فلسفه، سال 12، شمارة 3، ص40ـ29.##
خاتمی، محمود (1385) «ابژه زیبایی‌شناسیک»، پژوهشنامه علوم انسانی، شمارة 50، ص12ـ1.##
خوانساری، محمد (1395) دوره مختصر منطق صوری، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.##
سوانه، پیر (1388) «جستارها؛ پدیدارشناسی و هستی‌شناسی اثر هنری»، ترجمة محمدرضا ابوالقاسمی، زیبا‌شناخت، شمارة 20، ص280ـ261.##
لیوینگستون، پیزلی (1396) دانشنامه فلسفه استنفورد؛ تاریخ هستی شناسی هنر، ترجمة ابراهیم لطفی، تهران: ققنوش.##
مارگولیس، جوزف (1388) «خصلت غریب هستی‌شناسی اثر هنری»، ترجمة شهریار وقفی‌پور، زیبا‌شناخت، شمارة 21، ص216ـ207.##
هنفلینگ، اسوالد (1401) چیستی هنر، ترجمة علی رامین، تهران: هرمس.##
Bachrach, Jay E. (1973) “Richard Wollheim and the Work of Art”, Journal of Aesthetics and Criticism, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 108-111##
Budd, Malcolm (2012) “Richard Wollheim”, Aesthetics: the Key Thinkers, ed. by Alessandro Giovannelli, Continuum International Publishing Group.##
Currie, Gregory (2014) “Analytic Ontology”, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, ed. by Michael Kelly, Oxford University Press.##
Goodman, Nelson (1976) Languages of Art; an Approach to a theory of Symbols, Hackett Publishing.##
Herwitz, Daniel (2014) “Richard Wollheim”, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, ed. by Michael Kelly, Oxford University Press.##
Margolis, Joseph (1958) “The Mode of Existence of Work of Art”, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 12, no.1 , pp. 26-34.##
Margolis, Joseph (1959) “The Identity of Work of Art”, Mind, New Series, vol. 68, no. 269, pp. 34-50.##
Margolis, Joseph (2014) “Ontology of Art”, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, ed. by Michael Kelly, Oxford University Press.##
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1906) “Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmatism”, The Monist, vol. 16, no. 4.##
Walton, Kendall (1980) Art and its Objects, Cambridge University Press. ##
Walton, Kendall (1990) Mimesis as Make-believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts, Harvard University Press.##
Woterstorff, Nicholas (1975) “Toward an Ontology of Work of Art”, Noûs, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 115-142.##