Brentano's Later Theory of Intentionality (Reism) and its Outcomes with a Glance at Certain Muslim Philosophers' Views

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Associate professor of Shahid Motahari University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Presumably, Brentano's theory of intentionality besides his other theories of the mind, at least, in some particular aspects, could be contrasted with some of the issues in Islamic philosophy including, issues on mental existence, some of Suhrawardi Illuminationist rules (even Ghazzali in Mishkat al-anwar) on knower's essential luminosity and its principality and centrality in cognition, compound theory of knowledge or knowledge of knowledge in Ibn Sina and others, human soul as a cosmos in Mulla Sadra, soul's creation as real nature of perception at least sensible and imaginal level, essential awareness of the self to itself meanwhile, any other awareness, can be recourse to certain capacities on comparative studies. The present paper is an attempt to explore some centrality aspects of Brentano's theory of intentionality in early and later forms and its outcomes such as reism. In this study, a glance will be cast at Muslim philosophers' views in this regard to pave the way for a comparative study. To observe the standard of the journal, I refrain from going into detail about the issues.

Keywords

ابن‌سینا (1391). التعلیقات، تصحیح حسین موسویان، تهران: موسسۀ پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفۀ ایران.##
سبزواری، ملاهادی (1380). شرح المنظومه، تصحیح و تعلیق حسن حسن‌زاده آملی، تحقیق مسعود طالبی، قم:‌ دفتر تبلیغات اسلامی قم.##
سهروردی، شهاب‌الدین یحیی (1380). حکمة الاشراق، در مجموعه مصنفات شیخ اشراق، ج2، تصحیح هانری کربن، تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.##
طوسی، نصیرالدین محمد (1407ق). تجرید الاعتقاد، تحقیق محمدجواد حسینی جلالی، قم: مرکز نشر اسلامی.##
ملاصدرا (1382). الشواهد الربوبیه، تصحیح سید‌جلاالدین آشتیانی، قم: بوستان کتاب.##
Albertazzi, L. & Libardi Massimo, R. P. (1996). The School of Franz Brentano. Kluwer Academic Publishers.##
Aristotle (1924). Metaphysics. trans. by David Ross. Oxford University Press.##
Aristotle (1961). De Anima. edited with Introduction and Commentary by David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ##
Brentano, F. (1966). The True and the Evident. trans. by Roderick M. Chisholm, Ilse Politzer & Kurt R. Fischer. ed. by Oskar Kraus & Roderick M. Chisholm. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul [including: letter to Anton Marty, 17 March 1905].##
Brentano, F. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. ed. by Linda L. McAlister. trans. by Antos C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell and Linda L. McAlister. New York: Humanities Press.##
Brentano, F. (1977). The Psychology of Aristotle. edited and translated by Rolf George. Berkeley: University of California Press.##
Brentano, F. (1981a) The Theory of categories. Trans. by Roderick M. Chisholm and Norbert Guterman. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.##
Brentano, F. (1981b). Sensory and Noetic Consciousness. ed. by Linda McAllister. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.##
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. trans. and ed. by Paul Guyer & Allen w. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.##
Leibniz, G. W. (1998). Philosophical Texts. trans. and ed. by Richard Francks. Oxford University Press. ##
Moran, D. (1996). Brentano's Thesis. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Aristotelian Society [in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, Vol. 70, pp. 1-27].##
Smith, B. (1994). Austrian philosophy, The legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago: Open Court.##
Smith, B. (1998). Boundaries: a Brentanian theory. Brentano Studien, 8, pp. 107-114.##