Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 2 PhD student in Comparative Studies of Religions, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Since Spinoza believes that every act in the universe is a mode of modes a single substance or God, and that the difference in the acts goes back to their difference in how they are emitted from the substance, good and evil will be relative, and therefore Corona Virus will be considered absolute evil It is excluded. Such thinking is the product of the imagination of a being confined to space and time who seeks only his own benefit, and thus transforms evil - here the corona -which is non-existent into something objective and absolute, which are expressed with bad conceptions, Confusion, ugliness and wickedness, but if we extend these matters to God from this perspective, it will cause the greatness of God to be hidden from the intellect. For Spinoza, man, as a mode of infinite modes of substance, is hardly small and insignificant, but at the same time, he is great; because has an intellect that enables to have this insight.Corona shows man the consciousness of his limitation before God and nature, and this consciousness of limitation is itself an element of the bliss of being in God, without which such consciousness would not have been realized.On the other hand, since according to Spinoza, anything that causes human beings to live together in a collective agreement is beneficial, and conversely, a difference in society is evil, it can be said that, Corona insofar as it causes this agreement and empathy in societies, especially moral societies, It is Good.

Keywords

اسپینوزا، بارخ (1374). رساله در اصلاح فاهمه، ترجمه اسماعیل سعادت، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.##
اسپینوزا، بارخ (1392). اخلاق، ترجمه و شرح محسن جهانگیری، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.##
دلوز، ژیل (1392). اسپینوزا: فلسفه عملی، ترجمه پیمان غلامی، تهران: دهگان.##
لوید، ژنویو (1396). اسپینوزا و کتاب اخلاق، ترجمه مجتبی درایتی و همکاران، تهران: شب‌خیز.##
هریس، ارول، ای. (1389). طرح اجمالی فلسفه اسپینوزا، ترجمه سیدمصطفی شهرآیینی، تهران: نی.##
یاسپرس، کارل. (1389). اسپینوزا، فلسفه، الهیات و سیاست، ترجمه محمدحسن لطفی، تهران: طرح نو.##
Aquinas, T. (1994). The Treatise on Law. edited by R. J. Henle, Notre Dam: University of Notre Dam Press.##
Collingwood, R. (1949). The Idea of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.##
Furley, D. (2005) Rutledge History of Philosophy, V. 11. Routledge.##
Gilson, E. (1960). The Christian Philosophy of St. Augustine, translated by L. E. M. Lynch. New York: Random House.##
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza’s Letter on the Infinite. translated by Kathleen McLaughlin. in Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Marjorie Grene. New York: Doubleday.##
Levine, M. P. (1994). Pantheism, anons theistic concept of Diety. London: Routledge.##
Mason, R. (2008). The God of Spinoza, A Philosophical Study. Cambridge University Press.##
Plato (1997). Complete Works. edited by John M. Cooper. Hackett publishing company.##
Randall, J. H. (1960). Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press.##
Schimmel, A. (1993). The Mystery of Numbers. Oxfor: Oxford University Press.##
Spinoza, B. (2002). Spinoza Complete Works. translated by Samuel Shirly, edited with Notes by Michael L. Morgan. Hackett publishing company.##
Spinoza, B. (2007). TheologicalـPolitical Treatise. edited by Jonathan Israel, translated by Michael Silver Thome & Jonathan Israel. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.##
Wolfson, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza. New York: Harward Zac. Sylvian.##
Woodridge, G. E. (1966). Aristotle's Vision of Nature. New York: Columbia University Press.##